Di bawah ini adalah berita tambahan mengenai JUSUF KALLA DAN ANWAR IBRAHIM yang jelas kandungannya.
'Update' berikut adalah mengenai permintaan Anwar Ibrahim melalui mantan Wapres Jusuf Kalla supaya Dato' Seri Najib Tun Abdul Razak menghormati keputusan PRU 13. Bekas Menteri Hukum dan HAM Indonesia Bapak Hamid Awaludin hadir sebagai saksi. Anwar mendakwa Najib yang minta persetujuan itu sebaliknya Jusuf Kalla menyatakan Anwar yang minta. Apa kata saksi Hamid Awaludin.
UPDATE:
'Update' berikut adalah mengenai permintaan Anwar Ibrahim melalui mantan Wapres Jusuf Kalla supaya Dato' Seri Najib Tun Abdul Razak menghormati keputusan PRU 13. Bekas Menteri Hukum dan HAM Indonesia Bapak Hamid Awaludin hadir sebagai saksi. Anwar mendakwa Najib yang minta persetujuan itu sebaliknya Jusuf Kalla menyatakan Anwar yang minta. Apa kata saksi Hamid Awaludin.
UPDATE:
Did Anwar Ibrahim tell the Truth? - BERNAMA Interview with Hamid Awaludin.
Hamid Awaludin was Indonesian minister of law and human rights from 2004-2007 when Jusuf Kalla was vice president, and was Indonesian ambassador to Russia and Belarus from 2008-2011.
1. Anwar Ibrahim claims it was Jusuf Kalla who approached him whereas Jusuf Kalla said he was approached by Anwar. Which is true?
Hamid Awaludin:
I was present during Jusuf Kalla’s discussions with both Anwar and Najib. It was Jusuf Kalla who accepted Anwar’s request to mediate. He did not take the initiative and approach Anwar. Jusuf Kalla does not have any political and economic interests in Malaysia. He is busy with his affairs in Indonesia. So why would he take the initiative and approach Anwar? It isn’t logical.
Jusuf Kalla considers both Anwar and Najib as good friends. He wanted to help because they were competing fiercely with one another. That is how he saw this.
2. Anwar claims there were several "preconditions" in the agreement e.g. free elections, fair media, etc. Can you outline any preconditions?
Hamid Awaludin:
I am very sure that there were no preconditions discussed between Jusuf Kalla and Anwar. For me, a deal is a deal. And there was a deal that both parties – Anwar and Najib – agreed to.
Some people always try and find a loophole after the event, or an excuse not to deliver on their promise. Some people are different in character to others.
3. Anwar now claims PM Najib didn't sign the agreement and it was therefore not valid. Jusuf Kalla says the PM did give his verbal agreement and therefore the deal was agreed by both parties, and was valid. Is Anwar correct or is JusufKalla?