Assalaamu'alaikum Warahmatullaahi Wabarakaatuh
Dear brothers and sisters.
GOLD IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE
a. Failure of Bretton Woods
b. Imam Ghazali on Dirham and Dinars
d. Usury in the Religions of the Books
e. Terrorism, Syariah and Democracy
f. The Power of the Bankers - The Creation of Israel
g. What the West Fears
This speech is still relevant as some Muslim leaders have put more imporance on the security of Israel than the sufferings of the Palestians.
Thank you.
Dear brothers and sisters.
GOLD IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE
The topic of this speech is misleading if it gives the impression that it is only about gold and trade. The following sub-topics in the speech might be of interest to readers:
a. Failure of Bretton Woods
b. Imam Ghazali on Dirham and Dinars
c. The assassination of Abraham Lincold, John F. Kennedy, Al Malik Faisal, Albino Luciani (Pope John Paul 1) and the attempt on Richard M. Nixon's life
d. Usury in the Religions of the Books
e. Terrorism, Syariah and Democracy
f. The Power of the Bankers - The Creation of Israel
g. What the West Fears
This speech is still relevant as some Muslim leaders have put more imporance on the security of Israel than the sufferings of the Palestians.
Thank you.
Keynote Address by Tan Sri Dato’ Seri
Sanusi bin Junid
in The Kuala Lumpur International Conference
on Gold in
International Trade:
Strategic Positioning in Global Monetary System
at
Sheraton Imperial Hotel, Kuala Lumpur
on 29th September, 2003
Assalaamu’alaikum Warahmatullaahi Wabarakaatuh
Chairman of the seminar,
Deputy Governor of Bank Negara Malaysia,
Secretary General of Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
Rector of International Islamic University Malaysia,
Honoured guests,
Fellow participants of the seminar,
Ladies and gentlemen.
FAILURE OF BRETTON WOODS
Between August 19th and 20th, last year, at Putra World
Trade Centre (PWTC), Kuala Lumpur, an international conference was held on
stable and just global monetary system with the theme ‘Viability of the Islamic
Dinar’ as a response to the 1997 East Asian economic and financial crisis by
which Malaysia was ‘robbed’ of its economic well-being by the international
currency speculators.
The gold dinar, whether Islamic or not, is propagated by
the Prime Minister of Malaysia, the Honourable Dato’ Seri Dr. Mahathir bin
Mohamad . It is simply a gold payment system.
This propagation is a reintroduction of the role played by gold, as
money, before the United States President Richard Milhaus Nixon removed gold
backing from the US dollar as there was insufficient gold belonging to the
United States to back up the dollars needed to finance the Vietnam war. It was
either an admission of the failure of the Bretton Woods’ system to support the
us or just the arrogance of Nixon and his close advisors, in not wanting to use
the system.
EAST ASIA ECONOMIC CONGRESS
Between the 4th and the 6th of August this year an
international congress was held again at the Putra World Trade Centre where
delegates from East Asian countries unanimously agree that there is a need for
an East Asian fund to assist countries which are in financial or economic
problems or crisis. This implies a prevailing distrust in the present economic
system entrusted to the Bretton Woods institutions.
YOUNG MUSLIM LEADERS CONFERENCE
After that, between the 14th and 16th of September,
representatives from sixty nations attended an international conference of
young Muslim leaders held at the Renaissance Hotel, Kuala Lumpur where a resolution was passed to
create a world Muslim economic foundation. This again proved that there is an
overall discomfort, even among the young, on the economic plight of Muslims all
over the world.
The above three events were all officiated by the Prime
Minister of Malaysia.
Our seminar today would have been graced by him too had
he not been called to another unavoidable event sandwiched between his busy
schedule overseas and the launching of the Langkawi International Maritime and
Airshow
GOLD IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE (GIT)
This seminar zeros into specifics. It is a seminar on
‘Gold in International Trade’ or GIT. With this seminar and previous seminars
and conferences on related subject, our mind would have been prepared for the
Organisation of Islamic Conference Summit next month.
Today we are gathered again to discuss the implementation
of the gold payment system in international trade.
Historically, gold has held its value stable compared to
any fiat currency. It was Roy Jastram, in his book “The Golden Constant” who
showed that prices based on gold were relatively constant for 400 years.
Although at other forums we used the term ‘Islamic gold
dinar’, we have excluded the words ‘Islamic’ and ‘dinar’ in the terminology for
this forum, with the intention of removing the stigma and prejudice against
gold. There was of course the Iraqi dinar before the fall of Saddam, although
the Kuwaiti dinar is still in use. Hopefully the omission of the two words will
remove the prejudice on gold, due to Western propaganda against Islam, thereby
blurring their vision against a valuable commodity which can solve or minimise
the world economic problems.
It must however be remembered that the word dinar is
derived from the Latin word denarius which was the Roman Byzantine gold coin
circulating among the Arabs during the time of the Prophet Muhammad s.a.w. It
is therefore of western origin.
The dinar, equivalent to 4.25 grams of 22 carat gold
(91.6 per cent gold alloy) remained the monetary unit for Muslims until the
collapse of the Ottoman caliphate in 1924.
IMAM GHAZALI ON DIRHAM AND DINARS
In Ihya Al Uloom, printed in Cairo (1939) Imam Ghazali
stated:
The creation of
dirhams and dinars (money) is one of the blessings of Allah s.w.t. They are
stones having no intrinsic usufruct or utility, but all human beings need them,
because everybody needs a large number of commodities for his eating, wearing
etc. and often he does not have what he needs, and does have what he needs not.
Therefore, the transactions of exchange are inevitable. but there must be a
measure on the basis of which price can be determined, because the exchanged
commodities are neither of the same type, nor of the same measure which can
determine how much quantity one commodity is a just price for another.
Therefore all these commodities need a mediator to judge their exact value.
Allah The Almighty has created the dirhams and dinars (money) as judges and
mediators between all commodities so that all objects of wealth are measured
through them and their being the measure of the value of all commodities is based
upon the fact that they are not an object in themselves. had they been an
object in themselves one could have a specific purpose for keeping them which
might have given them more importance according to his intention, while the one
who had no such purpose would have not given them such importance, and thus the
whole system would have been disturbed. That is why Allah s.w.t has created
them, so that they may be circulated between hands and act as fair judge
between different commodities and work as a medium to acquire other things. So
the one who owns them, is as though he owns everything, unlike the one who owns
a cloth, because he owns only a cloth. Therefore, if he needs food, the owner
of food may not be interested in exchanging his food for cloth, because he may
need an animal for example. Therefore, there was needed a thing which in its
appearance is nothing, but in its essence is everything. The thing which has no
particular form may have different forms in relation to other things, like a
mirror which has no colour, but it reflects every colour. The same is the case
of money. It is not an object in itself, but it is an instrument that leads to
all objectives. So the one who is using money in a manner contrary to its basic
purpose is, in fact, disregarding the blessings of Allah s.w.t. Consequently,
whoever hoards money is doing injustice to it and is defeating their actual
purpose. He is like the one who detains a ruler in a prison. And whoever
effects the transactions of interest on money is, in fact, discarding the
blessings of Allah s.w.t. and is committing injustice, because money is created
for some other things, not for itself. So the one who has started trading in
money itself has made it an objective contrary to the wisdom behind its creation,
because it is injustice to use money for a purpose other than it was created
for. If it is allowed for him to trade in money itself, money will become his
ultimate goal, and will remain detained with him like hoarded money. And
imprisoning a ruler, or restricting a postman from conveying messages is
nothing but injustice. ‘
FATE OF WORLD LEADERS
However, while propagating a return to gold in
international trade we should look at the fate of propagators for anything
different in monetary approaches.
Initially we should note that many world leaders who
meddled with the financial systems, from as far back as Abraham Lincoln, have
met with fatalities.
There are many reasons offered for the rise and fall of
leaders in history. For purposes of our conference let us recognise those
reasons involving interference in the global financial system.
ABRAHAM LINCOLN
Abraham Lincoln was assassinated on 14th April, 1865 by
John Wilkes Booth. He printed the US dollars in green ink, called the
green-backs, and legalised the money through the House of Representatives. he
annoyed the bankers and the financiers.
It is believed, even as late as August 2002, at the
Church of England that Abraham Lincoln’s monetary policy from the year 1865,
constitutes the perfect basis for any monetary system for any “Modern Nation”
(including Britain ) regardless of race, colour, creed, timeframe or geography.
Lincoln’s policy was based on Ricardo’s model of 1823, for the National Bank of
England. The policy eloquently sums up the whole modern problem with its
solution in only 536 words. The policy reads:
1. Money is the
creature of law and the creation of the original issue of money should be
maintained as the exclusive monopoly of national government. Money possesses no
value to the state other than that given to it by circulation.
2. Capital has
its proper place and its entitled to every protection. The wages of men should
be recognised in the structure of and in the social order as more important
than the wages of money. no duty is more imperative for the government than the
duty it owes the people to furnish them with a sound and uniform currency, and
of regulating the circulation of the medium of exchange so that labour will be
protected from a vicious currency, and commerce will be facilitated by cheap and safe exchanges.
3. The
available supply of gold and silver being wholly inadequate to permit the
issuance of coins of intrinsic value or paper currency convertible into coin in
the volume required to serve the needs of the people, some other basis for the
issue of currency must be developed, and some means other than that of
convertibility into coin must be developed to prevent undue fluctuation in the
value of paper currency or any other substitute for money of intrinsic value
that may come into use.
4. The monetary
needs of increasing numbers of people advancing towards higher standards of living can and
should be met by the government. Such
needs can be served by the issue of national currency and credit through the operation
of a national banking system. The
circulation of a medium of exchange issued and backed by the government can be
properly regulated and redundancy of issue avoided by withdrawing from
circulation such amounts as may be necessary by taxation, redeposit, and
otherwise. Government has the power to regulate the currency and credit of the
nation.
5. Government
should stand behind its currency and credit and the bank deposits of the
nation. No individual should suffer a loss of money through depreciation of
inflated currency or bank bankruptcy.
6. Government
possessing the power to create and issue currency and credit as money and
enjoying the right to withdraw both currency and credit from circulation by
taxation and otherwise need not and should not borrow capital at interest as a
means of financing governmental work and public enterprise. The government
should create, issue and circulate all the currency and credit needed to
satisfy the spending power of the government and the buying power of the
consumers. The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme
prerogative of government, but it is the governments greatest creative
opportunity.
7. By the
adoption of these principles the long felt want for a uniform medium will be
satisfied. The taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest, discounts, and
exchanges. The financing of all public enterprise, the maintenance of stable
government and ordered progress, and the conduct of the treasury will become
matters of practical administration. The people can and will be furnished with
a currency as safe as their own government. Money will cease to be master and
become the servant of humanity. Democracy will rise superior to the money
power.”
Lincoln’s epitaph
should read:
“For successfully driving the money changes out of the
temple and denying world finance its opportunity to profit from the war it had created Abraham Lincoln
was shot three days later”.
JOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY
John Fitzgerald Kennedy was assassinated on 22nd
November, 1963 by Lee Harvey Oswald. He did the same feat as Abraham Lincoln.
He printed billions of us dollars and legalised them through the House of
Representatives. He did not please the bankers. When the wife of Lee Harvey
Oswald was asked whether she would blame Angleton for the assassination of the
President, she replied that there was not enough money with the Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA) to finance the assassination of a President and that
one should ask the bankers.
RICHARD MILHAUS NIXON
On 22nd February, 1974 Samuel Byck went to the nearest
air-port near Washington D.C., shot the air-port security, went into an
aeroplane, shot the air-hostess, shot the co-pilot, then persuaded the other
pilot to fly to the White House to kill Richard Nixon at breakfast time. Samuel shot himself, after having shot that
other pilot who had earlier informed the FBI by wireless on what was happening
in the plane. The attempt to assassinate Nixon failed. The assassination
attempt was not publicised and was quite unknown and easily forgotten.
Monetarily, Nixon angered the bankers, because in 1971 he withdrew gold backing
from the US dollars.
Nixon was brought down by the Watergate scandal, for
lying, which was really a red herring.
AL MALIK FAISAL
On 25th March, 1975 The King of Saudi Arabia Al Malik
Faisal, was shot by his nephew, Prince Faisal Mas’ud, while attending the
Kuwaiti national day reception. Prince Faisal Mas’ud was acquitted on the first
charge where he claimed that Al Malik Faisal was responsible for the death of
his brother Prince Malik Mas’ud who was
shot by the police while demonstrating at the television station because he had
opposed the introduction of television to Saudi Arabia by King Faisal. The
killing was done on the principle of an eye for an eye. It was an accepted act
of vengeance.
But Faisal Mas’ud’s head was chopped off because he was
guilty of the second charge which was not made known to the public.
PETRO DOLLAR
Al Malik Faisal is of course known for his intention to
introduce the petro-dollar, which would have been a competitor to the US
dollar, even before the Euro.
If the lady minister of Sweden, who is not a Muslim,
could be murdered in cold blood, while campaigning in favour of introducing the
Euro into Sweden which would eventually infect all the Scandinavian countries,
it is not difficult to imagine the opposition to the Petro dollar, particularly
when it was to be introduced in Islamic petroleum producing countries.
The Petro-dollar itself is enough as a burning
confrontational product without adding fuel by labelling it Islamic. The
financiers and bankers must have been pleased with King Faisal’s death or not
unhappy with it even if they are not involved in its planning.
ALBINO LUCIANI - POPE JOHN PAUL I
In the morning of 29th September, 1978 Albino Luciani or
Pope John Paul I was found dead after being a Pope for 33 days. The Vatican
claimed that he died of heart attack. But Albino’s doctor refuted the claim as
Albino was a regular mountain climber and suffers from low blood pressure, a
habit and a weakness which negates the possibility of a heart attack. The Pope
was in perfect health after he climbed a mountain about three days before his
untimely death.
The author David Yallop, in his book entitled ‘In God’s
Name’, claimed that two bankers, Roberto Calvi and Sindona were manipulating
the Vatican funds. The Pope wanted to distribute the Vatican’s wealth to the
poor of the world, particularly in Africa and Asia.
Had the Pope lived and implemented his programme by
withdrawing vast deposits in existing us banks, he would have suffocated the
United States banking system.
The Pope was poisoned, Roberto Calvi was found hung under
the Black-Friar Bridge in London, and Sindona who was undergoing trial, for
banking fraud, in Milan prison committed suicide by drinking cyanide, which was
brought to him in a bottle together with a letter, which he read and found it
necessary to end his life.
ANYBODY OR SOMEBODY
If a Catholic, a Protestant, a Muslim, a hereditary
monarch, a democratically elected leader, an Arab, an Italian, an Irishman and an
American can be killed for displeasing anybody or somebody, sane citizens of
the world must decide whether to co-operate, to submit, to manipulate or to
oppose the any-some-body who is responsible for the flow of innocent blood. But
before we could do anything for, against or with anybody or somebody we must recognize their existence.
The idea of narrating the above tragedies is merely to
highlight the challenges that will be faced by leaders, organisations and
nations, unilaterally or jointly, interfering in the existing world financial
network.
Having seen the woes against the propagators of financial
reform, we should be aware of the bigger picture plaguing the world scene
thereby hiding the true reasons behind the current conflicts that cannot be
understood in isolation.
I am referring to the ideological back-up to the economic
life of the people of the various religions in the world.
USURY IN THE RELIGIONS OF THE BOOKS
If one asks for only one word which separates Islam,
Christianity and Judaism on the one hand and Hinduism, Buddhism, Confucianism,
Taoism and zed Buddhism, on the other, the answer, in one word, is: usury.
It is not that usury was never condemned in Hinduism and
Buddhism but that the condemnation was in the very distant past.
As far back as the year 2400 B.C. even without usury,
debt itself was regarded as unjust burden on mankind. At that time in the
Sumerian city of Lagash the cuneiform debt cancellation tablets was found which
conclusively show that, unless debt was cancelled every seventh year, people
would not defend their country. Much like the law of jubilee under the law of
Moses, peace be upon him, which calls for the cancellation of all debts in the
7th year regardless of when the debt was incurred, a practice confirmed in the
Quran which says: ‘Better to forgive the debt, if you did but know it …. ‘.
Between 2000 and 1400 B.C. the verdict texts of ancient India mentioned
the word ‘ kusidin ‘ which is usurer. The sutra texts of 700 to 100 B.C. and
the Budhist jatakas between 600 and 400 B.C. made detailed references to usury
payments. But contempt for usury was diminished by the 2nd century A.D. After that there was a dilution in the Hindu
and Buddhist understanding of usury and it was no longer prohibited or
controlled in any significant way.
aAssuming that usury is the common factor discussed and
abhorred in Judaism, Christianity and Islam, all the religions of the books, it
is a wonder why adherents of Christianity and Judaism, find the people of the
other religions more acceptable to them than the Muslims, whose religion also
abhorred usury.
CHANGE IN ATTITUDE TOWARDS USURY
It does appear that there is a fundamental change in
attitude towards usury by the Christians and the Jews, which separates them
from the Muslims.
Religions which prohibit usury have ignored their
religious injunctions for many reasons, mainly:
A) A
distinction being made between lending for basic needs, when interest is
considered as usury; and lending for commercial purposes when interest charged
is permissible and not considered as usury.
B) A
distinction is being made between usurious and non-usurious interest rates
which is subjective.
The Muslims seemed to be sticking to the original
concept, or fundamental, of usury. Is it for that reason that we are all
classified as fundamentalists?
But the concept of usury or riba itself has undergone
many changes, even for Muslims. The exploitative rates on loans charged by the
Jews of old, though still practised by others in developing countries, may
still be considered exploitative and not tolerated; but lower rates have been
tolerated, renamed or further explained for acceptability by Muslims.
Indeed many rich Muslims, felt that they are modern or
westernised by their acceptance of riba, by any name, leaving the level of
exploitation in rates to agreements between consenting borrowers and lenders.
With this attitude, and other advantages and privileges
provided, it is little wonder that Muslim funds are being kept in non Muslims
banks.
ISLAMIC BANKING
Non-Muslims were sceptical of the idea of Islamic banking
in the past. But today even Jewish bankers or banks, which shares are owned by
Jews, have opened Islamic banking counters to receive or 7accept the much
coveted deposits from Muslims. The only Islamic part of the bank is probably at
the counters. After all money is neutral, neither racial nor religious.
In Islam the understanding and discussion on benefits,
interests or riba, depending on rates, is quite elaborate, and when propagators
of Islamic statehood talk about the imposition of the syariah law, in any
state, there is always the image of cutting of hands in the fore-front and
interest on deposits and loans in the back-ground.
This is where we confuse the trees, in the diagnosis,
from the forest.
ISLAMIC STATEHOOD
Propagators of Islamic statehood are labelled, by the
West, as fundamentalists, those who know Islam would of course object to the
disapproving attitude towards Muslim fundamentalists, as Muslim fundamentalists
should be good humans as the fundamentals of Islam are good and divine.
Recently, even terrorism is attributed to Islamic
fundamentalism.
TERRORISM, SYARIAH AND DEMOCRACY
Is it true than that the West is against terrorism,
against the syariah law which, among others, call for the cutting of hands. Is
the West genuinely for democracy?
Or what is it in Islam that frightens the West?
Definitely the West is not against terrorism because the
west supports state terrorism by Israel. Even some of those who condemned
terrorism need only to look straight into the mirror to recognise the real
terrorists. The West have also terrorised
the common people of Afghanistan and Iraq, against the will of even the
undemocratic and western inspired United Nations.
The West cannot be for democracy either, for they needed
the undemocratic Muslim nations, to support them in their effort to
aggressively, and inhumanly implant democracy in Iraq.
Is the west against the cutting of Muslim hands by
Islamic states? i do not think they object to the cutting of Muslim hands by
Muslims. They know that Muslim states cannot cut non-Muslim hands. It is
against human rights and against the freedom of religion. The Muslim states,
however, have the human right to freely
cut Muslim hands. I think the West would encourage the cutting of Muslim hands
because, even guilty Muslims will use their hands to handle weapons in their
fight against the enemies of Islam.
The more Muslim hands are cut the better it is for the
enemies of Islam.
WHAT THE WEST FEARS
That leaves only one factor that the West fears of the
fundamentals in Islam or of anybody with different fundamentals.
COMMUNISM AGAINST CAPITALISM
The west was against China when it was preaching
communism; and against Russia and Eastern Europe when it was under communism.
Russia and China were with the Western allies in the Second World War. The West
was, of course, not against the technological achievements of the communists.
Obviously they were against communism because communism was against capitalism.
GERMANY AND JAPAN FOR CAPITALISM
Although the West fought against Japan and Germany during
the Second World War but they were not against these two countries after the
war as Japan and Germany adopted the same capitalistic economic system.
WEST NOT AGAINST MUSLIM WAY OF LIFE
With the collapse of communism there is only Islam which
is feared by the West. The fear is not of the hudud, of what we eat, what we do
not drink, how we dress, whether we have a moustache, a beard or not, whether
we wish to have up to four wives or just one wife.
These are red herring issues being prioritised for
Muslims to be lulled away and to become reasons for conflicts among Muslims.
They do not object to our prayers, our hajj, our fardhu
ain.
THE WEST FEAR THE ISLAMIC ECONOMIC SYSTEM
But they fear our alternative Islamic monetary and
economic system. For this system will off set, or just delay, their plan for
total economics and monetary domination in the new world order.
THE WESTERN COMMISSION FEARS MONETARY REFORM
On 21st September, 1964, 39 years and 8 days ago, the
sub-committee on domestic finance of the Committee on Banking and Currency of
the United States House of Representatives presented to the 2nd session of the
88th Congress the ‘ Money Facts’ containing answers to 169 questions on money
in a supplement to a primer on money.
Among the questions asked:
1. Who has the
right to create money in the United States?
Under the constitution, it is the right and duty of
Congress to create money. It is left entirely to Congress.
2. To whom has
the Congress delegated this money-creating right?
To the banking system, that is, to the Federal Reserve
System and to the commercial banks of the country.
3. Why is the
money creating power important?
By creating money, banks provide the exchange media that
the economy needs to prosper and grow. since the growth and proper functioning
of the United States economy require increasing amounts of money over the
years, those who control the amount of money exercise great power over business
activity, the incomes people earn, and our economic strength.
6. Does
Congress supervise Federal Reserve policy making?
No. in practice the Federal Reserve is independent in its
policy making. The Federal Reserve neither requires nor seeks the approval of
any branch of government for its policies. The system itself decides what ends
its policies are aimed at and then
takes whatever action it sees fit to reach those ends.
These are only six of the answers to six questions asked
among the 169 questions and answers on money in the Money Facts.
AN EXAMPLE OF THE POWER OF THE BANKERS
When Lord Balfour, the Foreign Minister of Britain
visited the United States in 1917, he promised the bankers that Britain will
recognise the Zionist movement if America assist Britain by entering the fist
world war.
The American public was at that time against America
going to war.
In the same year 1917 the American bankers called a
meeting of prominent media editors to persuade them to make the American public
support American entry into the war. More than 20 major print and electronic
media companies were then bought over by the bankers. Subsequently, America
entered the war, Zionism was recognised by Britain as promised, resulting in
the creation of Israel, which is now the centre and the cause of the present
problems of the world, including the September, 11th attack on the World Trade
Centre, which gives the opportunity to the bankers to rebuild it, whatever be
the hue and cry over the victims.
Whoever owns the banks in America, the American public
have no power over them. And they can do nothing to reduce, control or
rationalise that power. It is a big error in history.
As such, the use of the term ‘ West ‘ should be changed
to ‘ Western Commission ‘ as not all western governments are against Islam, and
not all citizens of countries whose governments are against Islam share the
same sentiments towards Islam, just as not all citizens in Islamic nations are
not against Islam. There are ambassadors and high commissioners of nations
whose governments are against Islam cannot reveal their true feeling towards
Islam even if they do not share their governments’ sentiment. Sometimes even in
nations where the governments appear to be anti Islam, only one or two in the
leadership of that who are really against Islam.
SEMINAR LOOKS FOR AN ALTERNATIVE ECONOMIC SYSTEM
It is in this contexts that this seminar is held today
with a view to humbly offer the oppressed, or the manipulated of the world to
look into the alternative system, with discussion on gold in international
trade, as the starting point.
As the problem is great, the journey is long, we must go
about with our cool heads. After all the journey of a thousand miles begin with
but a single step.
If Muslims of the world enjoy Coca-Cola, Kentucky Fried
Chicken and Mc Donald, we probably can offer to pay in the more palatable gold
or even the ‘Islamic gold dinar’.
Let us hope that this initiative, as the unfinished
project of our beloved Prime Minister, Dato’ Seri Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, will be
a humble beginning to our economic salvation. With its success Abraham Lincoln,
John f. Kennedy, Pope Albino Luciani, and Al Malik Faisal would not have died
in vain.
Wabillaahi Taufik Wassalaamu'alaikum
Wabillaahi Taufik Wassalaamu'alaikum
Thank you.
P.S.: This entry was posted for a first time in this blog on Monday, April 22, 2013.
P.S.: This entry was posted for a first time in this blog on Monday, April 22, 2013.
3 comments:
"our beloved Prime Minister, Dato’ Seri Dr. Mahathir Mohamad"
DONT YOU KNOW 75% MALAYSIANS HATE THIS KUTTY.
IT IS PURE HYPOCRASY FOR SOME ONE WHO HAS SLAVED FOR A JEW OWNED BANK.
Tan Sri Sanusi.
Get your fact right.Isreal was created by Zionist and Not Banker.It so happen most of American Bank conteol by Jews family.
INI BERMAKNA ANAK PENDATANG ACHEH INI TURUT BERDOSA MENUBUHKAN ISRAEL KERANA BELIU PERNAH MENJADI HAMBA KAPADA SC BANK- BANK PENGAMAL RIBA MILEK YAHUDI LAKNATULLLAH.
Post a Comment